Assessment

BN20_NSG3104 Assessment 4a – Individual Written Report_Rubric
PROTECTED Holmesglen: KC/NURS 20-Apr-2022 U:Higher EducationBACHELOR OF NURSINGSubject FoldersNSG31042022AssessmentAssessment 4BN20_NSG3104_Assessment 4a Written Report Rubric_Student version.docx

RUBRIC CRITERIA	HIGH DISTINCTION	DISTINCTION	CREDIT	PASS	FAIL	Marks
Report structure  Follows a cohesive written report format including Cover Sheet, Title Page, Introduction, Methods, Discussion, Conclusion.  Sections defined by headings  Adheres to instructions including presentation & formatting	Succinct, well organised, logical, and coherent introduction. Introduces key points, outlines the direction of the report. Exceeds expectations. Structured according to acceptable report writing guidelines and to the task. Conclusion is insightful and comprehensive. Text is organised and sequenced appropriately to task (clear paragraphs, use of headings, formatted according to instructions).	Succinct, well organised, logical, and coherent introduction. Introduces key points. Meets all requirements. Report is coherent and structured. Recognisable conclusion. Main points are concluded within the first two sentences of the closing paragraph. Organised appropriately with only minor errors.	Well organised, logical, and coherent introduction. Key points are introduced. Meets all requirements. The main points are concluded within the closing paragraph. Mostly organised with some inconsistencies or errors e.g., formatting issues.	Could benefit from added structure. Introduction is included but does not introduce the main key points or is too general. Further insight needed. Meets most major task requirements. Reflection addresses the task but may not entirely follow reflective practice model. Main points are concluded within the closing paragraph. Verges on being organised but has inconsistencies or errors in formatting.	Does not clearly set the focus of the report. Conclusion is missing or does not summarise findings. Difficult to follow or lacks organisation and structure. Contains irrelevant information. Sections may be missing. Does not address requirements. Requires formatting.	/5
Knowledge and understanding relating to:  The impact of workplace culture in relation to the chosen topic.  Analysis of successful workplace culture  Compares ineffective workplace culture  Reports relevant evidence-based methods used to measure workplace culture  Describes evidence-based improvement strategies relevant to workplace culture & chosen topic	Demonstrates expert understanding and accurate analysis of the topic. Brings an original perspective and thought.	Demonstrates solid understanding of the key components of the topic.	Provides general information but could be improved by demonstrating further insight into the topic.	Demonstrates basic understanding of key components of the topic. Further reading and research of the topic could improve understanding conveyed. States the facts but lacks the application of key knowledge and ideas.	May supply inaccurate information. Demonstrates little reading of the topic. Conveys poor understanding. Lacking or inaccurate application of concepts. Further work required to be able to explain concepts in own words.	/10
Critical thinking skills Logical and appropriate. Skilfully analyses, assesses, and reconstructs thoughts and ideas. Communicates effectively (Watkins, 2019).  Discussion is relevant to workplace culture and chosen topic.  Able to relate workplace culture to chosen topic  relevance to the RN working within an Australian healthcare setting.  compares successful and ineffective workplace culture  examples are evidence-based  analyses the literature to identify appropriate & relevant improvement strategy	Thorough and expert understanding. Uses specific and convincing examples to support. Makes insightful connections. Accomplished and independent critical thinker. Comprehends what influences practice and patient outcomes. Draws accurate conclusions based on relevant theory and current research.	Thoughtful and proficient understanding of the topic. Relevant examples to support. Advanced critical thinker. Makes connections between issues/ideas. Understands what is effective for clinical practice.	Good understanding. Could benefit from added depth. Still practicing ability to think critically. Uses examples from the research. Some connections made between issues/ideas. Shallow analysis.	Basic understanding. Beginning critical thinker. Requires further guidance and added depth. Relies on vague or incomplete examples. Requires further evidence to support. Little connections made between issues/ideas. States some personal assumptions, values, and perspectives. May rely on poor paraphrasing or 1-2 direct quotes.	Little to no understanding. Has not examined the research on the topic. The task requires further revision. No relevant or accurate examples used to support. Words are not their own. Relies on information taken from another source.	/10

AssignmentTutorOnline

BN20_NSG3104 Assessment 4a – Individual Written Report_Rubric
PROTECTED Holmesglen: KC/NURS 20-Apr-2022 U:Higher EducationBACHELOR OF NURSINGSubject FoldersNSG31042022AssessmentAssessment 4BN20_NSG3104_Assessment 4a Written Report Rubric_Student version.docx

Research skills  Relies on literature that is current (<5 years), peer-reviewed, relevant to nursing context in Australia  Literature directly supports discussion  Reading and reference made to at least 15 references	Uses high quality, peer-reviewed sources which are reputable & current (≤5 years). Evidence of extensive research relevant to the topic. Demonstrates a comprehensive analysis and application of the literature in a structured logical, balanced, and congruent manner.	Uses acceptable, reputable & current sources (≤5 years). Thoroughly researched, relevant to the topic.	Sources acceptable and current resources (≤5 years). Sufficient research evident with general analysis of the literature.	Marginally meets the research requirements as evidenced by just meeting or almost meeting the number or quality of citations and references.	No or little evidence of research of topic. No or little analysis of literature.	/10
Written Communication skills  Work is of the required length and depth  readability  Proofread for errors in syntax, grammar, spelling, paragraphs, expression or word choice and spaces. Written in own words (proper paraphrasing)	Exceeds expectations. Demonstrates a coherent (logical and relevant) discussion. Free from errors in expression (syntax, grammar, punctuation). SI <20%.	Completed to a high standard. Content is generally relevant. Demonstrates a coherent (logical and relevant) discussion. Minor syntax, spelling and/or errors in grammar that are almost always non-distracting. SI <20%	Completed to a good standard. Conciseness evident although could be improved in some sections. Errors are evident and distracting in parts (spelling, grammar, syntax, expression). SI 20- 20%	Satisfactory standard. Could be improved by proving logic and further relevance to topic. May be difficult to follow in parts. Errors are evident and distracting (expression, syntax, grammar, spelling). SI >25%	Difficult to read or follow. May be incoherent, illogical, or irrelevant in some parts. Profuse errors in expression, syntax, grammar, spelling. May not be written in own words. Poor use of paraphrasing. Over-reliance on thesaurus or translation tool. Requires assistance from LSC. SI>25%	/5
Referencing  As per APA 7th  Citations & reference list align Reference list at the end of the document on a separate page	Completely complies with APA 7th both in-text and in the reference list. No errors	Complies with APA 7th in text and in reference list with minimal, minor errors.	Mostly follows APA 7th in-text and in reference list. Some errors present.	Errors in APA 7th apparent both in-text and/or in reference list.	No evidence of adherence to APA 7th. Profuse errors throughout. Incorrect citations included. References do not align with in-text citations. Information cited does not align with cited source.	/5
TOTAL MARKS	/45

 

• Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
• CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER