Assignment Task

Assignment Task

by B3ln4iNmum

1
Assignment Brief Academic Year 2020-21

Module code
and title:		 Project Module leader: Tajbir Ahmed
Assignment
No. and type:		 1. Presentation (500 words)
2. Board Report (1000 words)		 Assessment
weighting:		 100% Course Work
Assignment
submission Date:		 Monday 9th of May at 2pm Feedback Time
and Date:		 3 weeks from the date of final
submission

AssignmentTutorOnline

:

Assignment Task:
This assignment involves the preparation of a presentation (which outlines the project proposal and rationale)
followed by a Client Report which outlines the project plan, project scope and risk and evaluating the project
success.

 

This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your
achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
LO 1 Present and agree to a project proposal with the client.
LO 2 Use appropriate tools to collect, select and use information from a range of sources
LO 3 Evaluate the data relevant to the proposal.
LO4 Communicate the outcomes and recommendations.

 

Task Requirement
OVERVIEW:
Astra Plc is a small-sized company specialising in vitamin and mineral-based food supplements. The
company is looking to diversify its portfolio by launching a new health and fitness app in the next three
months. You have been hired by Astra Plc to assess the suitability of the new App.
DESCRIPTION OF THE TASK – WHAT YOU ARE BEING ASKED TO DO?
Prepare an annotated PowerPoint presentation (8-10 slides maximum) for Astra Plc, which outlines the project proposa
and rationale of the new health and fitness app (carry out relevant research e.g., background
information, what does the app do, why should it be built, potential customers, the likelihood of success) (LO1)
[500 words]

2
Assignment Brief Academic Year 2020-21
1. The presentation slides should be attached to the report as an appendix. Include speaker
notes at the bottom of each slide to explain the key points on the slide (Max 500 words).
However, you are not required to do a live presentation. Keep the slides succinct, and
you can use bullet points where necessary. The slides should be embedded in
the assignment, followed by the report.
2. Prepare a client report that covers the following: (LO2, LO3 & LO4) [1,000 words]
a. The Project Plan (discuss a plan for your app using a GANTT chat) (150 words)
b. Project Scope (discuss the app design and launch cost, social media integration; in-app
purchase; app customisation; testing of the app; launch of the app) (300 words)
c. Project Risk (what potential risks could impact the launch of the app, e.g., cost overruns, delays in
app design, design and compatibility issues; competition from other apps) (300 words)
d. Project Success (how will you measure the app’s success?) (250 words)
The report should be written in a formal business report format, consisting of a title page, a
table of contents, the main body of the work using appropriate headings covering the above
four points, and a reference list.

Referencing and Research Requirements
You must reference all information used in the presentation and the report, using the Harvard
Referencing Guide. You are required to include a reference list at the end of the report
arranged in alphabetical order irrespective of the sources.
You can access guidance to Harvard referencing here:

https://libguides.uos.ac.uk/academic/referencing/Harvard

How your work will be assessed
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated learning
outcomes for this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria, as defined in the University’s
institutional grading descriptors. If it is appropriate to the format of your assignment and your subject area,
a proportion of your marks will also depend upon your use of academic referencing conventions.
This assignment will be marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 3

3
4
Assignment Brief
Academic Year 2020-21

Please see the attached grid for the Level 3 grading descriptors.
Submission Details
This assignment should be submitted electronically via Moodle (module tutors will discuss this process with
you during class time).
• The report must be submitted as one document and PowerPoint slides must be
attached with the assignment in appendix as a part of the report.
You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed on
the University website: https://www.uos.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Academic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf. In
submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these
regulations –

 

Submission Date and Time
• This assignment must be submitted before 14:00 UK time on Monday 9th of May 2022
You should submit all work for summative assessments by the above deadline. Work submitted up to three
working days after the deadline will be accepted and marked, but the mark will be capped at the pass mark (40%) unless there
is a valid reason for the late submission (i.e., having been granted an extension to the deadline or a deferral under the
terms of the Extenuating Circumstances Policy). Work submitted more than three working days after the deadline
without a valid reason will not be accepted and will be recorded as 0% RN (refer, no work submitted). For more
information, please refer to: http://studenthandbook.uos.ac.uk/index.php/student
guides/assessment-the-basics-undergraduate

5
Assignment Brief Academic Year 2020-21
Feedback and marks for this assignment will be available in three weeks from the deadline.
6
Assignment Brief
General Grading Criteria

Level 3
In accordance with the FHEQ, at the end of Level 3 students will be expected to have a sound knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles
of a subject, and an ability to evaluate and interpret these within the context of that area of study. They should be able to present, evaluate and interpret
qualitative and quantitative data to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of their subject(s)
of study. They will have learned how to take different approaches to solving problems and wil be able to communicate the results of their study/work
accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments.

Academic Year 2020-21

Assessment
category		 Pass mark, demonstrating achievement of all associated learning outcomes Marginal fail Fail
1st: 70% – 100% 2:1: 60% – 69% 2:2: 50% – 59% 3rd: 40% – 49% 35% – 39% 20% – 34% < 20%
Knowledge and
understanding		 High quality work
showing detailed
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s).		 Work of solid
quality showing
competent and
consistent
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s)		 Adequate work
showing
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s), but
lacking depth and
breadth.		 Weak work
showing limited,
fragmentary
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s). Work
characterised by
inaccuracies,
irrelevant material
and/or absence of
appropriate
information.		 Unsatisfactory
work showing
weak and flawed
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s), for
example through
serious
inaccuracies,
inclusion of a
significant amount
of irrelevant		 Highly
unsatisfactory
work showing
major gaps in
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s).
Inclusion of largely
irrelevant material,
absence of
appropriate
information and		 elements missing
or inaccurate.

Simple factual of the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of
the subject(s)
approach showing
limited
understanding of
the basic
underlying
concepts and
principles of the
subject(s). Narrow
or misguided
selection of
material, with

7
Assignment Brief

Assessment
category		 Pass mark, demonstrating achievement of all associated learning outcomes Marginal fail Fail
1st: 70% – 100% 2:1: 60% – 69% 2:2: 50% – 59% 3rd: 40% – 49% 35% – 39% 20% – 34% < 20%
significant
inaccuracies.
Cognitive and
intellectual
skills		 Excellent
presentation,
interpretation and
evaluation of
concepts or
evidence,
facilitating a highly
logical, coherent
and balanced
development of
judgements or
arguments. Strong
awareness of other
stances.		 Good presentation,
interpretation and
evaluation of
concepts or
evidence, facilitating
a logical and
coherent
development of
judgements or
arguments that
shows awareness of
other stances.		 Adequate
presentation,
interpretation and
evaluation of
concepts or
evidence, facilitating
a largely logical and
coherent
development of
judgements or
arguments. An
emerging awareness
of other stances.		 A limited use of
concepts or evidence
to support emerging
judgements or
arguments, although
not always logical or
coherent and with
inaccuracies.		 Largely descriptive
work, with limited
effort made to use
concepts or evidence
to develop
judgements
arguments.
Information
accepted
or
uncritically, with
unsubstantiated
opinions evident.		 Descriptive work
with no effort made
to use concepts or
evidence to develop
judgements or
arguments. Views
expressed are often
illogical, invalid or
irrelevant. Minimal
or no use of
evidence to back up
views.		 Work is largely
irrelevant
inaccurate,
or
characterised by
descriptive text and
unsubstantiated
generalisations.
Complete lack of
evidence to back up
views.
Application of
theory to
practice (for
courses with a
professional
practice		 Excellent
application of
theory to practice,
with the student
making
appropriate,
highly 		Sound application of
theory to practice,
with the student
making appropriate,
well-developed and
articulated links		 Consistent and
accurate application
of theory to practice,
with the student
making appropriate
links between the		 Relevant theoretical
knowledge and
understanding
applied in practice,
but with students
not always making		 Limited
understanding of the
application of theory
to practice, with the
student often not
making appropriate		 Weak
understanding of
the application of
theory to practice,
with only occasional
evidence of the		 Very weak
theoretical
knowledge and
understanding, with
no evidence of
appropriate

Academic Year 2020-21
material and/or
absence of
appropriate
information.

8
element) developed and between the two. two. student making
9
Assignment Brief

Assessment
category		 Pass mark, demonstrating achievement of all associated learning outcomes Marginal fail Fail
1st: 70% – 100% 2:1: 60% – 69% 2:2: 50% – 59% 3rd: 40% – 49% 35% – 39% 20% – 34% < 20%
articulated links
between the two. 		logical links between
the two. 		links between the
two.		 appropriate links
between the two.		 application
practice.
in
Critical engagement
with a wide range of
relevant reading,
including research-
informed literature
where relevant.
Consistently
accurate application
of referencing.		 Engagement with a
wide range of
relevant reading.
Sound application of
referencing, with no
inaccuracies
inconsistencies.
or 		Engagement with an
appropriate range of
reading beyond
essential texts.
Referencing may
show
inaccuracies
minor
or
inconsistencies.		 Evidence of reading,
largely confined to
essential texts, but
mainly reliant on
taught elements.
Referencing may
show inaccuracies
and/or
inconsistencies.		 Poor engagement
with essential texts
and no evidence of
wider reading.
Heavily reliant on
taught elements.
Inconsistent and
weak use of
referencing.		 Limited evidence of
reading and/or
reliance on
inappropriate
sources. Limited
engagement with
taught elements.
Very poor use of
referencing.		 No evidence of
reading or
engagement with
taught elements.
Absent or
incoherent
referencing.
Presentation,
style and
structure * 		Highly effective
presentation of
work that is
coherently
structured and
clearly expressed
throughout.		 Competent
presentation of work
in terms of structure
and clarity of
expression.		 Work is structured in
a largely coherent
manner and is for
the most part clearly
expressed.		 Ordered
presentation in
which relevant ideas
/ concepts are
reasonably
expressed.		 Work is loosely, and
at times
incoherently,
structured, with
information and
ideas often poorly
expressed.		 Work is poorly
presented in a
disjointed and
incoherent manner.
Information and
ideas are very
poorly expressed,
with weak English
and/or
inappropriate style.		 Work is extremely
disorganised, with
much of the content
confusingly
expressed. Very
poor English and/or
very inappropriate
style.

Academic Year 2020-21
Reading and referencing * Work that significantly exceeds the specified word limit may be penalised.

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *