ASSESSMENT TASK 3 – Critical Reflective Essay
Learning Outcomes Assessed: 1,2,3,4,5
Due Date: Wednesday 8th June, 2022 by 11:59pm
Weight: 50% (marked out of 100)
Length: 2000 words (excluding concept map and reference list, includes in text citations)
Submission: – . Parts A & B are to be submitted via TURNITIN as one document.
Task aim: To critically reflect on how your own culture, life experiences, worldview and dominant cultural paradigms, influences your perceptions of, and interactions with, Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples in health care.
Task rationale:
Critical reflection of an experience, situation or performance allows for deeper learning, insight and conscious decision making to improve and transform professional practice (Walker, Schultz &
Sonn, 2014). Critical reflection is identified in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Curriculum Framework as an important process to lifelong learning (Department of Health, 2014).
References
Department of Health. (2014). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health curriculum framework. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Walker, R., Schultz, C., & Sonn, C. (2014). Cultural Competence – Transforming Policy, Services, Programs and Practice. Dudgeon, P., Milroy, Walker, R. (Eds.). Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and
Wellbeing Principles and Practice (pp. 195 – 220)
Task description:
Part A
Create a detailed concept map that explores a subject that has resonated with you in the First Peoples Health and Practice course (3121MED). To assist you, you should ask yourself:
1. What has resonated with me the most in this course?
2. What are the key concepts within this subject that stood out tome?
3. How did these concepts make me feel and/or how did I react when I heard this?
4. Why did I feel or react this way?
5. Continue to ask yourself ‘why’ to unpack each concept in detail, from your personal, professional and the dominant cultural lens.
Part B
Using the concept map completed in Part A as a guide, write a 2000 word critical reflective essay, applying the following critical reflection framework:
1. Define and discuss a question that you would like to know more about that has come from your critical thinking in your concept map.
2. Reflect on how your own culture as well as your professional culture, influence your understanding of this question and how this shapes your perceptions of and interactions
with First Peoples.
3. Analyse the perspectives of others including dominant structures to explore the underlying causes and effects relating to your question.
4. Discuss what you have learnt from this critical reflective process and how this learning influences your perceptions of, and interactions with, Australia’s First Peoples in the
health care setting.
5. Discuss how your future practice may be transformed as part of this process.
Tips:
• Refer to the ‘Research and Writing tips’ as well as the Griffith Health Writing and Referencing Guide for tips about writing and reading in a critical way.
• Please use APA 7th formatting for referencing as well as times new roman font, 12 pt font size, 1.5 line spacing.
• Please refer to the mini lecture located in Assessment 3 folder to assist you with getting started and formulating a question from your concept map.
| Criteria -/ 100 | Exemplary | Excellent | Above Average | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| 1 5% |
Concept Map | Highly detailed concept map; insightful exploration of the subject and key concepts; deep questioning and explicit thought process. 5 marks |
Detailed concept map; indepth exploration of the subject and key concepts; deep questioning and clear thought process. 4 marks |
Some detail provided in concept map; some exploration of the topic and key concepts; sound questioning and thought process. 3 marks |
Basic concept map with some exploration of key concepts; basic questioning and thought process. 2.5 marks |
Limited to no concept map submitted 0-2 marks |
| 2 10% |
Depth that subject DEFINED |
Insightful definition and discussion of the reflective question, supported by reputable evidence found in scholarly literature. 8.5 – 10 marks |
Indepth definition and discussion of the reflective question, supported mostly by reputable evidence found in scholarly literature. 7.5 – 8 marks |
Detailed definition and discussion of the reflective question, with some support from relevant literature. 6.5 – 7 marks |
Describes the reflective question, basic details are supported by literature. 5 – 6 marks |
Poor definition and discussion of the reflective question with limited or no support by literature. 0-4 marks |
| 3 20% |
Depth of REFLECTION demonstrated |
Insightful reflection on how your own culture and professional culture influences your understanding of the question including your perceptions of and interactions with First People. Uses exemplary evidence of scholarly literature; shows explicit links between how your personal and professional cultures influence your understanding of the question. 17 – 20 marks |
Indepth reflection on how your own culture and professional culture influences your understanding of the question. Uses detailed evidence of scholarly literature; shows strong links between how your personal and professional cultures influence your understanding of the question. |
Detailed reflection on how your own culture and professional culture influences your understanding of the question. Uses evidence of some scholarly literature; shows some links between how your personal and professional cultures influence your understanding of the question. |
Basic reflection on how your own culture and professional culture influences your understanding of the question with reference to the literature. 10 – 12 marks |
Limited reflection on how your own culture and professional culture influences your understanding of the question with minimal reference to the literature. |
| 0-9 marks | ||||||
| 15 – 16 marks | 13 – 14 marks | |||||
| 4 20% |
Depth of ANALYSIS demonstrated |
Insightful analysis of the underlying issues, causes and effects from varying perspectives including the dominant cultural paradigm. Uses exemplary evidence of scholarly literature; shows explicit links between how the dominant cultural paradigm influences your understanding of the question. |
Indepth analysis of the underlying issues, causes and effects from varying perspectives including the dominant cultural paradigm. Uses detailed evidence of scholarly literature; shows strong links between how the dominant cultural paradigm influences your understanding of the question. |
Detailed analysis of the underlying issues, causes and effects from varying perspectives including the dominant cultural paradigm. Uses evidence of some scholarly literature; shows some links between how the dominant cultural paradigm influences your understanding of the question. |
Basic analysis of the underlying issues, causes and effects from the dominant cultural paradigm, with reference to the literature. 10 – 12 marks |
Limited analysis of the underlying issues, causes and effects from the dominant cultural paradigm, with minimal reference to the literature. 0-9 marks |
| 17 – 20 marks | 15 – 16 marks | |||||
| 13 – 14 marks | ||||||
| 5 20% |
Depth of LEARNING Demonstrated |
Insightful reflection and discussion about what you have learnt from undertaking this critical reflection process, including how this may influence your perceptions of and interactions with First Peoples in the healthcare setting. 17 – 20 marks |
Indepth reflection and discussion about what you have learnt from undertaking this critical reflection process, including how this may influence your perceptions of and interactions with First Peoples in the healthcare setting. 15 – 16 marks |
Detailed reflection and discussion about what you have learnt from undertaking this critical reflection process, including how this may influence your perceptions of and interactions with First Peoples in the healthcare setting. 13 – 14 marks |
Basic reflection and discussion about what you have learnt from undertaking this critical reflection process, including how this may influence your perceptions of and interactions with First Peoples in the healthcare setting. 10 – 12 marks |
Limited reflection and discussion about what you have learnt from undertaking this critical reflection process, including how this may influence your perceptions of and interactions with First Peoples in the healthcare setting. 0-9 marks |
| 6 15% |
Reflect on TRANFORMATION to your professional practice |
Insightful discussion on how your health professional practice may be transformed after undertaking this critical reflective process. Detailed examples are provided. 13 – 15 marks |
Indepth discussion on how your health professional practice may be transformed after undertaking this critical reflective process. Detailed examples are provided. 11 – 12 marks |
Detailed discussion on how your health professional practice may be transformed after undertaking this critical reflective process. Some examples are provided. 9 – 10 marks |
Basic discussion on how your health professional practice may be transformed after undertaking this critical reflective process. Minimal examples are provided. 8 – 9 marks |
Limited discussion on how your health professional practice may be transformed after undertaking this critical reflective process. Examples are minimal or not provided. |
| 0-7 marks | ||||||
| 7 10% |
Academic writing | Adheres strictly to academic writing standards. Correct terminology when referring to Australia’s First Peoples. A minimum of 12 peer reviewed articles. Literature led by First Peoples authors is included. |
Adheres mostly to academic writing standards. Appropriate terminology when referring to Australia’s First Peoples. A minimum of 10 peer reviewed articles. Literature led by First Peoples authors is included. 7.5 – 8 marks |
Generally adheres to academic writing standards. Generally appropriate terminology when referring to Australia’s First Peoples. A minimum of 8 peer reviewed articles. 6.5 – 7 marks |
Limited adherence to academic writing standards. Limited use of appropriate terminology when referring to Australia’s First Peoples. A minimum of 6 peer reviewed articles. |
Lack of adherence to academic writing standards. Inappropriate terminology when referring to Australia’s First Peoples. 5 or less peer reviewed articles. |
| 8.5 – 10 marks | 5 – 6 marks | 0 – 4 marks |
AssignmentTutorOnline
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
