Matrix
by Sangeet GURUNG
Submission date: 14-Feb-2022 10:39PM (UTC+1100)
Submission ID: 1762079025
File name: 18.224100_117638323_1113483580_Matrix.docx (102.03K)
Word count: 1145
Character count: 6759
AssignmentTutorOnline
1
In text referencing
Unclear
2
3
Unclear
and food waste
4
Incorrect referencing
FINAL GRADE
60/100
Matrix
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Sangeet you have made a good attempt to follow the guidelines but need to
ensure you included all the elements that were described in t the Assessment
brief.
You have not identified the main concepts /definitions clearly in the articles you
selected. In most cases you have discussed what food waste is and sometimes the
concepts were there but not clearly presented. . You were provided with a sample
matrix which clearly showed how concepts should be presented and you have not
done that.
The methods section identified some aspects but not all – for example research
approach sampling were not addressed at all.
The findings and conclusion showed understanding of the article content
although detail was missing- for example the Chawla article had a number of
clear findings which you did not really discuss..
The contribution of the study should address theoretical as well as practical
implications.
QM
QM
You were asked to analyse an industry, non-academic article as your 5th article – you
have not done this.
Your analysis summarised each article but did not synthese these sufficiently.
The synthesis need to look at similarities and differences. Furthermore you did
not discuss the relevance for your own research nor any gap that exists in the
literature.
You were asked to provide the DOI in the Appendix and make sure you use
correct referencing format.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
Comment 1
Research problem needs to be addressed with some level of detail
In text referencing
Check for correct referencing in text (APA 7th edition)
PAGE 4
Unclear
This part is not clear as to what exactly is meant in this statement
QM
QM
Comment 2
These are not concepts or definitions.
Comment 3
You were not asked to provide information about the analysis.
Unclear
This part is not clear as to what exactly is meant in this statement
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
Text Comment. and food waste
Comment 4
Also need to discuss the relevance of these articles to your own research
PAGE 7
Incorrect referencing
Incorrect referencing
RUBRIC: BRH606 – LIT REVIEW MATRIX
RESEARCH
FAIL (0-49%)
PASS (50-64%)
CREDIT (65-74%)
DISTINCTION (75-84%)
HD (85-100%)
MATRIX
FAIL (0-49%)
PASS (50-64%)
CREDIT (65-74%)
DISTINCTION (75-84%)
HD (85-100%)
Credit (65-74%)
Quality and relevance of articles selected
Demonstrates a lack of research skills. Did not meet assessment requirements with regard to quantity and
quality of articles. Articles selected are not relevant to the research topic.
Demonstrates satisfactory research skills. Met the assessment requirements with regard to quantity of
articles. Selected articles are not always of high quality or relevant to the research topic.
Demonstrates good research skills. Met the assessment requirements in terms of quantity and quality of
articles. Selected articles are relevant to the research topic.
Shows clear evidence of research skills. Met the assessment requirements in terms of quantity and quality
of articles. Selected articles are highly relevant to the research topic.
Shows clear evidence of research skills, exceeding the given requirements. Exceed the assessment
requirements in terms of quantity and quality of articles. Selected articles are highly relevant to the
research topic.
Pass (50-64%)
Quality of matrix, iincluding understanding of research methods
Demonstrates no understanding of theory and the literature review process. Does not identify relevant
information from the articles.
Demonstrates limited understanding of theory and the literature review process. Does not always identify
all relevant information from the articles.
Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of theory and the literature review process. Identifies all
relevant information from the articles.
Demonstrates a good understanding of theory and the literature review process. Accurately identifies and
details all relevant information from the articles.
Consistently demonstrates a critical and advanced understanding of theory and the literature review
process. Accurately identifies and meticulously details all relevant information from the articles.
ANALYSIS
FAIL (0-49%)
PASS (50-64%)
CREDIT (65-74%)
DISTINCTION (75-84%)
HD (85-100%)
COMMUNICATION
FAIL (0-49%)
PASS (50-64%)
CREDIT (65-74%)
DISTINCTION (75-84%)
HD (85-100%)
Pass (50-64%)
Analysis and synthesis including identification of research gaps
Demonstrates limited synthesis and analysis of literature. Does not identify any research gaps.
Demonstrates satisfactory analysis and synthesis of literature, however, this is at times generic or
superficial. Identifies some research gaps, however these are not always clear and applicable to one’s
research.
Demonstrates good analysis and synthesis of literature. The ways in which the literature relates to one’s
own research is discussed. Identifies research gaps that are clear and applicable to one’s research.
Demonstrates critical and well-developed analysis and synthesis of literature. The ways in which the
literature relates to, and informs one’s own research is discussed. Accurately identifies research gaps that
are clear and applicable to one’s research.
Demonstrates critical and advanced analysis and synthesis of existing knowledge. Insights on how the
literature relates to, and informs one’s own research is detailed. Accurately positions the literature against
one’s own research to identify clear and relevant research gaps.
Pass (50-64%)
Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks
supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning.
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of
reasoning is often difficult to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of
reasoning is easy to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well
supported by evidence. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic through a good line of
reasoning
Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating
a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic through an
excellent line of reasoning
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
