Marking scheme
High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Justification (3 marks) All syntax, run-time and logical errors have been fixed. A succinct description of each is provided. All syntax, run-time and logical errors have been fixed. The description and/or the explanation of the fix is limited. Some errors have been fixed. An explanation is present. All or some errors have been fixed. No description of the fixes. OR No errors have been fixed. Some description provided. No attempt. Readability (2 marks) Code commenting is used to described the algorithm. Code is spaced using indentation and line-breaks to distinctly separate sections of the program, to separate instructions and comments, and to separate symbols, mnemonics and addressing. Code commenting is used, with some sections needing more detail to describe the algorithm. Code is spaced appropriately to separate instructions and comments, or sections of the program. Code commenting is used but provides minimal description of the algorithm. Code spacing is used minimally. Code commenting is used but provides no description of the algorithm. Code is spaced poorly. No code commenting is used. Code is not spaced. Test cases (2 marks) An appropriate number of test cases are listed to exhaust all potential cases. Edge-cases are considered. An adequate number of test cases are listed. Some edge-cases are considered. An adequate number of test cases are listed. Consideration for edge- cases is minimal. Test plan is brief. No attempt. Test plan lacks the ability to provide insight into determining whether the program will function as expected.
AssignmentTutorOnline
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
