HI60325 IS Governance and Risk
Group Literature Review: Group Assessment
Assessment Weight: 65% (4 deliverables)
Due: Sessions 4, 7, 10-12, 13
Objective(s)
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment
is designed to improve student presentation skills and to give students experience in researching the
literature on a specific topic relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter in a group setting. Students
will be expected to complete a literature review to discuss a contemporary governance, compliance,
risk and security issues which an IS professional may experience. Students will critically analyze
current academic papers then present their work both in a detailed literature review and a class
presentation.
Instructions
This assessment will be completed in groups of 3 students (or as determined by the unit
coordinator). Groups will be formed within the first 3 weeks of class. If, in the view of the
coordinator, groups are not forming within a reasonable time period, the coordinator will randomly
allocate students to groups. Students will be expected to work within these groups for the remainder
of the semester on the group assignment. The topic for the group assignment will be determined by
the unit coordinator and allocated to each of the groups as they are formed. Each group will be
allocated a different topic.
Students joining the class late will be allocated to a group and no choice will be given.
This assessment is worth 65% of the units grade is is a major assessment. Students are advised to
begin working on this assessment as soon as you have formed or are allocated to a group.
There are four (4) deliverables for this assessment
| Deliverable | Weight | Week Due |
| Outline Submission | 5% | Week 4 |
| Draft Submission | 15% | Week 7 |
| Class Presentation | 15% | Weeks 10-12 |
| Final Submission | 30% | Week 13 |
AssignmentTutorOnline
The day and time of the due week that the assessment must be submitted will be announced by your
subject coordinator.
________________________________________________________________________________
1
Deliverable Descriptions
Below is a description of the different deliverables and the requirements
Outline Submission
The outline deliverable is due in week 4 and is the outline of the paper the group intends to write.
The outline will consist of: the title, the names of the group members and a list of the section
headings that will be included in your Literature Review. You should include at least 5 section
headings which are relevant to the topic your group has been allocated, (this list should not include
either ‘Introduction’ or ‘Conclusion’, though these can be included apart from the 5 others). Your
group needs to include at least five preliminary references and indicate in which section they will be
included. The references must be relevant to the topic assigned.
Thus once allocated your topic, you need consider how you will structure the literature review so
you can devise a list or headings. You must have access the full-text article of any reference you
use. You cannot use a reference where you only have access to the abstract and title, or a small
section of the paper.
Draft Submission
The draft submission is due in week 7 and continues on from the outline submission above with the
same topic your group was allocated.
For the draft submission your group is to write an Introduction, consisting of at least 2 paragraphs,
and you are to write one major paragraph for each of the five sections that you identified in the
outline submission.
Your introduction and other paragraphs should cite references from your reference list, and your
reference list for this submission should include your previous references and at least another 5
references which are relevant to the topic allocated. So your reference list should contain at least 10
references at this stage. All references must be in Harvard format including the in-text citations. For
each reference you must include a link to the full text of the reference. This link must be working
and cannot be to just an abstract and title, or only a section of the paper you are referencing. This
must be a direct link, we will not follow multiple links trying to find the paper.
If for some reason you decide to change one of the headings from the outline submission, your
group needs to write why this has changed, and are to follow the rules above by providing one
major paragraph for the new section. The section needs to be relevant to the topic and of course
your associated references need to be relevant.
________________________________________________________________________________
2
Class Presentation
The Class presentations will be conducted in weeks 10-12, depending on the number of groups, and
continues on from the outline and draft submissions.
In this submission each group is to prepare a number of powerpoint slides and give a short
presentation (10-15 minutes) on their group topic to the class. Each group should outline the topic
they are writing a literature review for, the major sections of the paper developed to date and the
work to be included in the final submission. The presentation is worth 15% of the assessment and
will be used to provide final feedback to each group prior to the final group submission. The unit
coordinator will determine the timetable allocation for the group presentations (which includes the
week). All students must be present and take part in their group presentation. Any student not
present for their group presentation will not be eligible for any of the marks associated with this
submission.
Final Submission
The final submission of your paper is due in week 13 and continues on from the outline and draft
submission above with the same topic your group was allocated.
The final submission from the group should be 5000 words and include the work you have already
done in the draft submission (including any changes based on feedback). Your group needs to
extend the work already performed in the draft
The final version of your paper is the polished version, the approach should follow the same plan as
your draft, but obviously some change may have occurred from the draft. You should not use a lot
of small sections and bullet points in the final version. Your literature review should be presenting
the state of current knowledge in the specific area of your topic, and as such, should have a
narrative that flows from one paragraph to another. You cannot achieve this with bullet points and
small disjoint sections. All references included with your paper must be cited within the paper and
be appropriate to the context of the citation.
I would expect at east 15 references in the final submission, and as well as providing the links to the
full-text articles, you are required to use an adapted Harvard referencing scheme for the in-text
citations. This adapted Harvard citation requires you to provide the page and paragraph number in
the reference that the content you are referencing can be found. For example, the reference may be
listed as
P Hawking, B McCarthy, A Stein (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf
The in-text citations would then be
________________________________________________________________________________
3
The company decided to implement an enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence
strategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).
In the above example with p3(4), the p3 refers to the page number within the reference, and the (4)
refers to the paragraph number within that page where the content can be found. These referencing
markers will be checked for accuracy and authenticity as part of the assessment grading process.
For the final submission, In Summary:
• All references must use the Harvard adapted referencing style as described
• The length of the paper is to be 5000 words (excluding the references, contents etc.)
• The final submission is to build on what was already completed in the draft submission
• The font of the body text should be 12pt Times New Roman font, 1.5 line spaced
• Section Heading should be in Arial Bold 12 point font
• At NO time should you use Wikipedia as a reference
Non Adherence to Referencing Guidelines
Where students do not follow the above referencing guidelines:
1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines will be asked to
resubmit their assignments.
2. Late penalties will apply, as per the Student Handbook each day, after the student/s have
been notified of the re-submission requirements.
3. Students who provide false referencing information (including the page and paragraph
markers) will be referred to the Academic Integrity Unit.
Submission Guidelines
Your document should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. Do
not use PDF as a submission format,
All submissions will be submitted through the safeAssign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxes
linked to SafeAssign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submitted
through these submission links will not be considered.
Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above)
and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be
penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies.
The SafeAssign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism.
SafeAssign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class
members submissions for plagiarism. You can see your SafeAssign similarity score (or match)
when you submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a
________________________________________________________________________________
4
chance to change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to
the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be
graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalized
according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan
early and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiple
submissions, but please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you
submitted will be taken from that submission.
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic Integrity
is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’ graduates. Accordingly,
all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six
categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have any questions about Academic Integrity
issues related to your assessment tasks, please consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing
guidelines and support resources. Many of these resources can also be found through the Study
Sills link on Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range from
deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment,
or cancellation of course enrolment.
Table 1: Six categories of Academic Integrity breaches
| Plagiarism | Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is known as self-plagiarism. |
| Collusion | Working with one or more other individuals to complete an assignment, in a way that is not authorised. |
| Copying | Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied, this may also be considered an offence. |
| Impersonation | Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as oneself, in an in-person examination. |
| Contract cheating | Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task, generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment. |
| Data fabrication and falsification |
Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false conclusions, including manipulating images. |
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
________________________________________________________________________________
5
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
