Marker 2 Comrnents: No Abstract was provided Chapter 1 provides a background to the topic though the narrative doesn’t flow well. No Aim is given or rather it is buried in some of the sections. The objectives do provide some reader understanding of the de facto topic at hand.
The Literature Review (Chapter 2) is of a disappointing quality with many parts of the text stating ‘facts’ that are not supported by citations. The citations that are given are often overused, with too much detail included from each individual source. More generally the Review needs more of the analysis directly connected to the topic itself.
The Methodology (Chapter 3) is too theoretic, lacking justification and sufficient details of the intended plan to collect and analyse relevant data. It is often hard to follow with, for example a section on Pilot Tests that is particularly lacking in clarity.
As a result of the overly theoretic Methodology, it was unsurprising that the Data Analysis lacks quality and value with statistics being produced without any real explanation of what they represent.
Chapters 5 and 6 lack any backward pointers to identify the derivation of the findings and as a result the work became even more disjointed. Indeed, much of the material discussed is seemingly unconnected to the previous chapters.
Chapter 7 is misguided as it discusses almost nothing about the student’s own learning experience from the dissertation process.
Overall, this dissertation has too many flaws, notably a Methodology that is lacking in practical details and the resultant very confused data analysis.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS