Skip to content
Menu
Shark College
Shark College
Nutritional Biochemistry & HumanMetabolism

Nutritional Biochemistry & HumanMetabolism

May 2, 2022 by B3ln4iNmum

SCIE2006_Assessment 3_Brief1_Digital Case Study Presentation_Final Page 1 of 5

ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title SCIE2006 Nutritional Biochemistry & HumanMetabolism
Assessment Digital Case StudyPresentation
Individual/Group Individual
Length 8 minutes
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the Subject LearningOutcomes
outlined at the bottom of this document.
Submission Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.1 (Week11)
Weighting 45%
Total Marks 100 marks

AssignmentTutorOnline

Context
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate your understanding and
knowledge on the topics of nutrients and neurotransmission, epigenetics and nutrigenomics by
applying them to the case scenario provided below.
Case Scenario
A 48-year-old female presents herself to you suffering from bouts of anxiety and mild depression..
She has recently being diagnosed with colon cancer and is currently under the care of an
oncologist. The client is seeking nutritional advice from you.
Instructions
1. In response to the case scenario, you are required to record an 8 minutes digitalpresentation
demonstrating your understanding of the following topics:



Nutrients and neurotransmission
Epigenetics
 Nutrigenomics

2. Please cover the following concepts in your presentation:

 Relevant neurotransmitter pathways and involved cofactors


Epigenetic causes of colon cancer
Nutrients and bioactive dietary compounds

3. Please create your presentation slides using PowerPoint. You could use approximately
6-8 PowerPoint slides
for this 8 minutes presentation.
4.
How to record a digital presentation?
The following link provides information on filming a digital presentation.
SCIE2006_Assessment 3_Brief1_Digital Case Study Presentation_Final Page 2 of 5
5. Referencing



This is a research based assessment. Therefore, referencing is mandatory.
You are required to use
a minimum of eight references with at least five references from
academic sources (e.g. peer-reviewed journals).
In-text citations as well as a reference list following the APA referencing style must be
included.
Please see more information on referencing here:
https://library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool



6. Please refer to the marking rubric to ensure you address all the assessmentcriteria
Submission Instructions
Please submit the digital case study presentation via the Assessment link within assessment 3 by
Sunday by 11.55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week11).
Uploading your digital case study presentation: Detail instructions on compressing (if necessary)
and uploading your video presentation is availableat:
link
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can
be viewed in My Grades.

SCIE2006_Assessment 3_Brief_Digital Case Study Presentation_Module 6.1 Page 3 of 5
Assessment Rubric

Assessment
Attributes
Fail
(Unacceptable)
0-49%
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84%
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Use of visual aids
Visual aids supportsthe
spoken message.
Use of colour, layout,
clarity and neatness of
visual aids.
20%
No PowerPoint slides
were used OR
PowerPoint slides were
occasionally appropriate
and related to the spoken
message. The slides
require significant
improvement in design,
colour choice, layout and
neatness.
PowerPoint slides
supported the
presentation. They clarified
and reinforced the spoken
message. However, most
content requires clarity and
improvement in design,
layout and neatness.
PowerPoint slides supported
the presentation effectively.
They clarified and reinforced
the spoken message.
Demonstrates an acceptable
level of design and layout
that supports the flow of
information.
PowerPoint slides were
carefully prepared and
supported the presentation
effectively. They clarified
and reinforced the spoken
message. The visual aids
added impact and interest to
the presentation through the
use of good design and
layout to support the flow of
information.
PowerPoint slides were
carefully prepared and
supported the presentation
effectively. They clarified
and reinforced the spoken
message. The PowerPoint
slides have an excellent
design and layout which
supports the flow of
information and all of the
required elements are well
placed and clearly defined.
Knowledge and Lack of understanding of Limited understanding of Adequate knowledge or Thorough understanding of Highly developed
understanding required concepts and required concepts and understanding of the the required concepts. All of understanding of the
Understanding of the knowledge. Most of the knowledge. Some of the key required concepts. A the key components are required concepts.
key components are not components are not reasonable capacity to presented. Demonstrates a All of the key components
key concepts and addressed. Lack of addressed. Limited explain and apply relevant good understanding of the are well presented.
knowledge. application and analysis of application and analysis to key concepts. concepts and ability to apply Recommendations are
Application and information to provide provide clear Supports personalopinion and analyse relevant clearly justified based on
clear recommendations. recommendations. and information information from the the application and analysis
analysis of information substantiated by evidence research/course materials of information from the
to provide clear from research to provide and extended reading to research/course materials
recommendations recommendations. provide clear and extended reading.
40% recommendations.
Effective Techniques used to Techniques used to engage Techniques used to engage An interesting or original An interesting or original
Communication engage audience were audience were adequate. audience were effective. approach taken to the topic. approach taken to the topic.
minimal, or mainly Presenter usually spoke Presenter spoke clearly to Presenter spoke clearly and Presenter spoke clearly and
ineffective. Presenter clearly to ensure audience ensure audience at a good pace to ensure at a good pace to ensure

SCIE2006_Assessment 3_Brief_Digital Case Study Presentation_Module 6.1 Page 4 of 5

Ability to engage the
audience
Clarity, pace and
fluency
Clear and logical
structure.
20%
occasionally spoke clearly
and at a good pace.
Difficult to understand.
Lack of logical and clear
structure.
comprehension. Delivery
was usually fluent.
Information, arguments and
evidence are presented in a
way that is not always clear
and logical.
comprehension. Delivery was
fluent. Information and
evidence are adequately
presented with a mostlyclear
flow of ideas and arguments.
audience comprehension.
Delivery was fluent.
Information and evidence
are well presented with clear
and logical flow of ideas and
arguments.
audience comprehension.
Delivery was fluent and
expressive. Expertly
presented with a clearand
logical flow of ideas,
arguments and evidence.
Context and purpose
Suitability of
presentation for the
purpose and the
audience
10%
Demonstrates little or no
awareness of the context.
Limited or no attempts
were made to tailor the
presentation content to
the intended purpose of
informing, interesting or
persuading.
Demonstrates limited
awareness of the context.
Some attempts were made
to tailor the presentation
content to the intended
purpose of informing,
interesting or persuading.
Demonstrates a reasonable
awareness of the context.
The presentation content,
structure and delivery were
tailored to the audience and
to the intended purpose of
informing, interesting or
persuading.
Demonstrates a good
awareness of the context.
The presentation content,
structure and delivery were
closely tailored to the
audience and to the
intended purpose of
informing, interesting or
persuading.
Demonstrates a thorough
awareness of the context.
The presentation content,
structure and delivery were
closely tailored to the
audience and to the
intended purpose of
informing, interesting or
persuading.
Use of academic and Poorly written with errors Written according to Written according to Well-written and adheres to Expertly written and
discipline conventions in spelling and grammar. academic genre and has academic genre. the academic genre. adheres to the academic
Spelling, grammar, Demonstrates accurate spelling, grammar, Demonstrates consistent use Consistently demonstrates genre. Demonstrates expert
inconsistent use of good sentence construction. of credible and relevant expert use of good quality, use of high-quality credible
sentence construction, quality, credible and Demonstrates consistent research sources to support credible and relevant and relevant research
appropriate use of relevant resources to use of credible and relevant and develop ideas. There are research sources to support sources to support and
credible resources, support and develop research sources to support no mistakes in using theAPA and develop appropriate develop arguments and
Correct citation of key ideas. There are mistakes and develop ideas, but style. arguments and statements. position statements. Shows
resources using APA in using the APA style. these are not always Shows evidence of reading extensive evidence of
style of referencing explicit or welldeveloped. beyond the key reading. reading beyond the key
10% There are some mistakes in There are no mistakes in reading. There are no
using APA style. using the APA style. mistakes in using the APA
style.

SCIE2006_Assessment 3_Brief_Digital Case Study Presentation_Module 6.1 Page 5 of 5

The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in thisassessment
SLO b) Identify and explain the main metabolic pathways and the role of nutrient cofactors, substrates, enzymes and coenzymes in maintaining
normal metabolic function.
SLO d) Examine and discuss the nutritional biochemistry of the blood brain barrier and neurotransmitter synthesis.
SLO e) Demonstrate an understanding of the importance of nutrigenomics and epigenetics to professional practice.
SLO f) Develop and integrate nutritional biochemistry knowledge in professional practice.

 

  • Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
  • (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
  • CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • impact of sleep problems
  • business culture of Singapore
  • AT2 assignment the description is attached
  • electing the group work option
  • team has a client organization

Recent Comments

  • A WordPress Commenter on Hello world!

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2022 Shark College | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!