1
Principles of Management
MN4062QA
Assignment 1: Reflective Paper
Due date: Friday, 25 March 2022 (week 14)
Assignment 1: Reflective paper comparing traditional and contemporary approaches of
management .
Write a short reflective paper based on the content covered in weeks 1-6 and the feedback
on the Formative Assignment done in week 4.
Word limit: 500 words.
Use the questions provided to structure your assignment.
Learning Outcome (LO)
LO1: identify major developments in the history of managerial thought including classical and
contemporary approaches
Assignment Task:
In this part of the ASSIGNMENT, you are asked to produce an account of your learning in the first
six weeks of the semester. In doing so you should consider your experience on this module, the
feedback you have received and your own reflection on the outcome of the formative assignment.
Your academic essay should discuss the following points:
1. What have you learned so far in this module? Please clearly show the knowledge you
gained in the lectures/seminars and by studying the literature recommended by comparing
traditional and contemporary approaches of management.
2. How has the feedback you have received about your work helped you identify 1) what you
are good at and 2) areas of your work that need improvement?
3. What do you want to do next? – Identify one of the areas of your work that need
improvement and outline 2 or 3 ideas for development.
2
Assessment criteria:
1. Presents an understanding of what you have learned in your module so far. Discusses
management theories and compares approaches. (50%)
2. Explains how feedback has helped you identify the strengths in your work. (20%)
3. Demonstrates that you understand how your work needs developing and illustrates what
can be done to improve it further. (20%)
4. Presents work clearly and accurately using the appropriate personal expression and
organisational form (i.e., follows recommended structure, uses third person to refer
to information from literature and references sources correctly by using the Harvard
Referencing System). (10%)
This assignment is the first part of the portfolio and carries 40% to your overall mark.
3
| Grading Scheme for Assignment 1 for MN4062QA Reflective Paper |
||
| Marking criteria | Letter grade |
Mark recorded |
| Excellent understanding shown with ability to make links across topics and synthesise learning. Explained in a very convincing and effective manner with clear strengths identified and exemplified. Consistent and highly effective critical reflection which demonstrates a strong ability to identify future developments for your work. Highly effective use of expression and organisational form. |
A | 70-100% |
| Overall good and well-developed understanding shown with some ability to make links across topics and synthesise learning. Explained in an effective manner with useful references to some strengths Effective critical reflection which demonstrates good ability to identify future developments for your work. Very good use of expression and organisational form. |
B | 60-69% |
| Good descriptive understanding shown with some ability to make links across topics and synthesise learning. Coherent account of how feedback has helped them identify key strengths outlined Coherent critical reflection which demonstrates an ability to identify future developments for your work. Overall, well expressed. Some minor errors. Overall clear structure and organisation. |
C | 50-59% |
| Overall general understanding shown but with little ability to make links across topics and synthesise learning. Some understanding of how feedback has helped them and some awareness of personal strengths. Some evidence of critical reflection but lacking a more coherent ability to identify future developments for your work Meaning generally clear. Occasional errors which make work difficult to understand at times. Adequate structure with inconsistent organisation |
D | 43-49% |
| Some general understanding shown but with little ability to make links across topics and synthesise learning. Limited understanding of how feedback has helped them and limited awareness of personal strengths. Superficial reflection which lacks criticality and does not sufficiently identify strategies for further development Meaning sufficiently clear. Errors which make work difficult to understand at times. Barely adequate structure with inconsistent organisation. |
Pass | 40-42% |
| Basic understanding shown with no clear links made across topics and no attempt to synthesise learning. Showing very little understanding of the purpose of feedback in developing your work. Limited understanding of personal strengths Limited reflection which lacks criticality and does not sufficiently identify strategies for further development. Meaning not always clear. Errors which frequently make work difficult to understand. Limited structure with erratic organization |
Condoned Pass |
30-39% |
| Little or no knowledge or understanding of what they have learned. Overall, no understanding of the purpose of feedback in developing their work and no identification of strengths in your work. No effective reflection and lack of ability to identify strategies for future development. Meaning not clear. Errors which frequently make the work difficult to understand. Very poor structure and organisation. |
F2 | Under 30% |
| Fail – Non-submission. | F3 | 0% |
AssignmentTutorOnline
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
