Principles of Management

Principles of Management

by B3ln4iNmum

Principles of Management

MN4062QA

Assignment 2

Individual Paper based on group project.

Due Date: 25th March 2022

This assignment is weighted at 60%.

Assignment 2: Individual Paper based on group project due in week 14

Report to be submitted using Turnitin (in Weblearn) before 3 p.m. on Friday 25th March 2022.

Report needs to be 1,000 words.

Assignment task:

For your group presentation (due week 11) – (w/c 28th February 2022)

You could visit the Museum of London with your group (3-4 students) or click here or the link below to choose your ‘historical person’ from the Museum of London’s catalogue of Historical Persons. If you know of any person in history you would like to learn about, you are welcome to choose such a person, but it must be agreed with your team.

Go to the web page of the Museum of London: https://collections.museumoflondon.org.uk/online/authorities/

Chose the filter ‘People’ so see some interesting personalities and start your research here (you will need to consider other resources as well).

Identify a historical person at the Museum of London you find interesting and research its history.

Link the actions to the CVF: What actions has this person engaged in that show behaviours related to the four approaches? [This video clip will be of help in performing this function: https://youtu.be/45veR-Se-rI]

In your individual assignment (due week 14 – 25/03/2022)

Based on the presentation in week 21, write a report that reflects on your group work using teamwork and motivational theories.

Based on the information you gathered about your own actions, how would you describe yourself using the CVF’s Action Imperatives discussed in week 9?

The criteria for marking your report include:

Demonstrate in-depth understanding of teams and motivation theories. – (50%)

Show ability to apply the CVF to own actions and behaviours. – (40%)

Structure, referencing, research. – (10%)

1

Grading Scheme for Assignment 2 for MN4062QA

Individual Report

Marking criteria

Letter

Mark

grade

recorded

The work shows evidence of:

70+

A

Explains in depths how content and process theories can be used to improve

motivation and productivity in a team.

Very good application of CVF, referring to own actions and behaviours in a very

reflective manner.

Describes very relevant and theoretically sound techniques to improve teamwork.

Excellent structure, very coherent and logical, easy to follow through.

Excellent referencing in text and list following Harvard system without mistakes.

Evidence of very wide reading and research in recent publications, relevant books and

journals.

The work shows evidence of:

B

60-69

Explains well how content and process theories can be used to improve motivation

and productivity in a team.

Good application of CVF, referring to own actions and behaviours.

Describes relevant and good techniques to improve teamwork.

Coherent and logical structure throughout.

Good referencing in text and list following Harvard system with only minor mistakes.

Evidence of wide reading and research in mostly highly relevant and recent

publication.

The work shows:

C

50-59

Explain some aspects how content and process theories can be used to improve

motivation and productivity in a team.

The CVF is mentioned, but the link to own actions and behaviours is rather weak.

Describes some techniques to improve teamwork.

Coherent and logical structure in most parts provided.

Attempt to use references in text and list, not always following Harvard system.

Evidence of some reading.

The work shows:

D

40-49

Either content or process theories are discussed. The application to teamwork is very

weak

Own actions and behaviours have not been clearly embedded in the CVF.

Limited description of techniques to improve teamwork.

Some structure detectable, but not very coherent or logical.

Follows Harvard system, but not throughout.

Evidence of reading is limited.

Does not address the task set. Presents minimal material related to the topic. Little

0-39

F1

evidence of understanding of the task set. Poor structure. Attempt to use source,

referencing not used.

Fail – Non-submission.

F3

0

2
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *