EEDBACK ON THE WRITTEN ELEMENTS OF THE MODULE WILL BE BASED ON POSTGRADUATE GRADE CRITERIA:
CLASS GRADE OVERALL DESCRIPTION Distinction 8, 100 7, 84 A+ Outstanding Excellent 70-A-Very Good 74 Merit 67-69 Clood 64-66 60-63 Pass 57-C+ Satisfactory 59 .-56 50-53 c-Marginal Fail 4, 49 MF Unsatisfactory Fail 3, 44 Poor 0-Very poor 35
GUIDELINE GRADE DESCRIPTIONS
Your work is of an exceptional, high standard which has the potential for submission for publication in a peer reviewed journal or equivalent.
Your work demonstrates a sophisticated and comprehensive knowledge of the subject area. You have shown an exceptional ability in the appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools to analyse and synthesise at Masters level. Your work is well-constructed and demonstrates a professional approach to academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). It addresses the learning outcomes/assessment criteria fully.
Your work demonstrates strong knowledge of the subject area and the ability to develop an independent and sophisticated argument or evaluation. The ideas you put forward demonstrate exceptional clarity and focus and your work adheres to the prin.. of 130od academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). It addresses the learning outcomes/assessment criteria fully.
Your work demonstrates a well-developed critical and comprehensive understanding of the topic. It shows evidence that you have thoroughly researched the topic. and are able to construct an independent, logical argument or evaluation. Your work demonstrates a high degree of ability in the appropriate use of relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools to analyse and synthesise at Masters level. Your work is well-structured and logically written and demonstrates good academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format, clear, accurate English). There is a good attempt to address the learning outcomes/assessment criteria, meeting all of them to some extent and some of them well.
Your work demonstrates knowledge of the subject area and the ability to develop an independent, logical argument or evaluation. It shows competence in the appropriate use of literature, theory, methodologies, practices or tools. The development of some ideas in your work is limited but it attempts to analyse materials critically. At times the expression and structure of your work is not clear and you have not consistently followed good
academicce (cdatinna referencing; presentationnrTace;r’::uraeE?ls Your work =ieZle1nfresponseoutcomes/assessment but does not fully :Zr all Ofthecteria
Your work contains some weaknesses. It provides some evidence that you have necrilis-itsntradt:esZeca structure rtnuZtsthn:oar:a:=17rodo’l:glireZnrk practices or tools but not at Masters level. Your work fails to address one or more criteria fully.
Your work is unsatisfactory in it demonstrates very limited knowledge of the subject area and does not succeed in grasping the key issues There is little evidence of development of ideas and critical analysis is very limited. The presentation is confused and lacks coherence. Your work does not meet the learning outcomes/assessment criteria.
Your work demonstrates no real knowledge of the subject area and does not display the critical ability required at this level. Your work does not attempt to address the learning outcomes/assessment criteria adequately.
Dashboard
AssignmentTutorOnline
Calendar To do Notifications Inbox
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
